October 17, 2010
The Science of Biceps Training
Want to improve the development of your biceps? If so, it’s necessary to understand a little applied anatomy. The biceps brachii is a two-headed muscle, comprised of the short head (which sits on the inner portion of the upper arm) and the long head (which sits on the outer portion of the upper arm). The long head of the muscle crosses the glenohumeral joint at the shoulder while the short attaches at the coracoid process on the front aspect of the scapula (shoulder blade). Why is this significant? Well, during performance of exercises where the upper arm is held behind the body, the long head is placed in a greater position of stretch compared to the short head and therefore is able to generate maximal force. Conversely, during performance of movements where the upper arm is held out in front of the body, the long head is slackened to a greater degree (a phenomenon called active insufficiency) and therefore force production is compromised.
Given that the long head of the biceps also has a secondary role in abduction of the shoulder, it also will become actively insufficient when performing curling movements where the the arms are raised out to the sides (i.e. as if performing a biceps pose in bodybuilding). Thus, the short head will be worked to a greater extent in these exercises.
What’s more, evidence shows that aspects of the biceps are “partitioned”, with both the long and short heads comprised of individual architectural compartments that are innervated by private branches of the primary nerves. EMG studies of the long head of the biceps brachii show that muscle fibers in the lateral portion of the muscle are recruited for elbow flexion, fibers in the medial aspect are recruited for supination, and centrally located fibers are recruited for non-linear combinations of flexion and supination. Furthermore, the short head appears to be more active in the latter part of an arm curl (i.e. greater elbow flexion) while the long head is more active in the early phase.
So what does all this mean in terms of muscle development? It means that you have the ability to target either the short head or the long head by varying arm angle! Exercises such as incline curls and drag curls (where the upper arm is positioned behind the torso) place more emphasis on the long head of the biceps. Alternatively, exercises such as preacher curls and concentration curls (where the upper arm is positioned in front of the torso) work more in the short head, as do exercises such as cross cable curls on a high pulley apparatus. “Traditional” barbell and dumbbell curls (where the upper arm rests at the sides) will place a fairly equal amount of stress on both heads of the biceps. Performing supinated curls as well as hammer curls will ensure complete activation of the fibers in the long head.
This now begs question as to how you should apply this information. Unless there is a visible discrepancy between the two heads of the muscle (which is unlikely and difficult to assess), your best bet is to vary your choice of exercises. When performing a split routine, a good approach is to choose one movement from each group and then perform two to three sets per exercise each session. In this way, you ensure that all available muscle fibers are optimally worked over time, thereby promoting complete and symmetrical development of the muscle. Keep total sets to no more than about nine or so per workout to ensure you don’t overwork the biceps–they are a small muscle and are involved as synergists in many upper body exercises. Also, make sure to train through a full range of motion so that both heads are worked to their fullest extent.
Stay Fit!
Brad
4 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Thanks for the advice. I personnally pratice supination pull-ups, inclined curl and inclined hammer curl. Should I add rotative curl (elbow flexion) or is it enough for a complete developpement ? Thank you !
Comment by David — August 29, 2012 @ 3:09 pm
In regard to symmetry of the biceps, long and short head. I have good genetics but a notable difference in left to right biceps..
Has anyone noticed the difference in their left to right biceps? My left has even development on both long and short head giving it a blocky look i dont think is ideal making it hard to get a real peak.. but my right has better development on the long head and a higher origin of the short head giving my right bicep a peakier look. I notice although Arnold has the best arms in my opinion, he has this notable difference! Does anyone else out there have this and does it bother you as much as it does me? cheers :)?
Comment by Lyndon — June 11, 2014 @ 12:22 am
So the point is to train both long heads and short heads of the biceps equally in a split routine?
However i have this question is that by training the long head of the biceps will make your bicep less blocky in a front double bicep post?
I do have a large difference in both left and right bicep! my right bicep look much more better than the left one as it looks blocky:(
Any advice would be appreciated:)
Comment by Anthony — July 30, 2014 @ 11:02 pm
I know more about muscle ficus and training than anyone!!! — that is anyone — until I was humbled by your articles. Amazing!!
Some questions: what is the best way to elongate the inner biceps head to increase tension-length properties? It has always seemed to me that pre-supinated, externally rotated curls — unless done one arm flat side style across a Scott bench perhaps inhibit? short head recruitment? Twenty years ago I invented, to the best of my awareness, “Offset Curls” and my TELLEKINETICS concepts to enhance inner head supination, concentric and eccentric, resistance. Regardless, have you tried offset curls and to what end? There are offset lateral and chest fly variations I haven’t yet bothered to publish.
Back to biceps inner head — your thoughts would be highly welcomed.
jerry
Comment by Jerry Telle — August 29, 2014 @ 6:14 pm